Tehelka.comtehelkahindi.com criticalfutures.org

Search for archived stories here...

    SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
    Posted on 26 April 2012
    Suhas Chakma

    Combating caste violence

    Suhas Chakma on why it’s high time the law on Prevention of Atrocities is enforced

    Illustration: Sanjoy Naorem

    THAT THE government of India lacks strategy to combat caste violence stood exposed at the state home ministers’ conference on effective implementation of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act held in New Delhi on 17 April 2012. The conference organised by the Ministry of Home Affairs at the request of the Minister for Social Justice and Empowerment Mukul Wasnik deliberated on the status of necessary institutional framework for the protection of the rights of the SCs/STs, registration and investigation of offences under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, delineation of atrocity-prone areas and preventive action in regard thereto, and pendency and conviction rate of cases under the Prevention of Atrocities Act.

    Dalits and tribals continue to face atrocities and caste-based discrimination in all spheres of life. At least 32,712 cases of crimes were committed against the Scheduled Castes in 2010 while at least 5,885 crimes were committed against the tribals during the same period. Ten states led by Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh, Bihar and Madhya Pradesh account for 93 percent of the crimes against scs, while Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Odisha are among the 10 states which alone witness 95 percent of anti-tribal atrocities. Minister Wasnik said that the conviction rate on cases of atrocities on SCs and STs was 3-8 percent, while the pendency of such cases in courts was 80-90 percent. The conviction rate in cases of atrocities against SCs and STs was 3.3 percent in Karnataka, 6.4 percent in Gujarat and 6.6 per cent in Maharashtra, while the pendency rate was 90 per cent in Gujarat, 88 per cent in West Bengal, 87 percent in Maharashtra and 82 percent in Bihar.

    It goes without saying that the state governments have been indifferent in taking the initiatives laid out by the Prevention of Atrocities Act. Only three states have set up ‘special police stations’ for anti-SC/st crimes, with Bihar having nine, Chhattisgarh 12 and Madhya Pradesh 48. Most states have not established Special Courts. The Prevention of Atrocities Act provides for periodical review of performance of special public prosecutors and of prosecution of the cases. A few states follow up on this provision.

    At the heart of the non-implementation of the Prevention of Atrocities Act lies the dichotomy of India’s approach to address caste violence: welfare vs rights based approach. The Prevention of Atrocities Act is an enabling rights-based legislation while the state follows the welfare approach for its implementation. The state has been vested with all the responsibilities to implement the Prevention of Atrocities Act, including penalising public servants for dereliction of duty. However, in the last 23 years, not a single police officer in the country has been penalised for dereliction of duty under the Prevention of Atrocities Act. It is in this context that the proposal of Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar to ensure payment of daily allowance to witnesses to present themselves in courts makes little sense. The registration of FIR is the first hurdle faced by them. It is only if the fir is registered and the police file a chargesheet that the question of being present in the court arises. The welfare approach has also meant enhancement of compensation without any assistance for prosecution of the guilty.

    WHILE THE Ministry of Social Justice and the Ministry of Home Affairs can rightly lambast the state governments for doing little, the Ministry of Social Justice has equally done little for implementation of the Prevention of Atrocities Act. Under the ‘scheme of grant-in-aid to voluntary and other organisations working for Scheduled Castes’, the Ministry of Social Justice provides funds to involve the voluntary sector and training institutions of repute to improve educational and socio-economic conditions of the target group, i.e. Scheduled Castes with a view to upgrade skill to enable them to start income-generating activities on their own or get gainfully employed in some sector or the other. The ministry funds programmes such as (1) opening of hostels and residential/non-residential schools, Industrial Training Institutes, art and crafts centres, or any other income generating scheme; (2) meeting the cost of tuition fees for training in Information Technology at institutions of repute to be selected by the Ministry of Social Justice; (3) organising balwadis and bal kendras i.e. creches to look after the deprived children of Scheduled Castes; (4) providing medical facilities to Scheduled Castes through establishment of hospitals or mobile dispensaries; (5) creating awareness regarding government programmes and facilities providing assistance and guidance in getting various government facilities like legal-aid, scholarships, loans and various grant etc., and other client services; (6) providing assistance for grievance redressal; (7) coaching centres for various entrance examinations and tests and other service related competitive examinations, which are not covered in Pre-Examination Coaching Scheme and taking up human rights issues, environmental issues and related to protection of consumers’ rights; and (8) training of NGOs in accounts, management and how to apply, etc. The same is true of the Ministry of Tribal Affairs.

    Effective implementation of the Prevention of Atrocities Act means prosecution of the culprits. Prosecution is an expensive and cumbersome process. Justice can be done if the victims could hire lawyers from the stage of registration of the complaints to the delivery of justice.

    Proper implementation of the Prevention of Atrocities Act to reverse the current trend of low rate of conviction and pendency in trial will be more effective than providing arms licences to SCs/STs in ‘atrocity-prone areas’ to safeguard themselves and their property. If India were to provide more gun licences to address caste violence, it would create further risk for the SCs and STs, as they could then be prosecuted for alleged crimes committed with the armed licences.

    Suhas Chakma is director of the Asian Centre for Human Rights.
    [email protected]

    SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
    Posted on 26 April 2012



  About Us | Advertise With Us | Print Subscriptions | Syndication | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Contact Us | Bouquets & Brickbats