|
|
|
| Tehelka
Magazine, Vol 4, Issue 44, Dated Nov 17, 2007 |
Options
for the Supreme Court
SHOULD
NOT THE SUPREME COURT of India, which is known for having
taken suo motu cognisance of matters of great public interest
in the past, have responded by this time? Being seized of
the matter, the SC is legally and constitutionally expected
to take prompt action against those the exposé has
unmasked. It could even have recommended the dissolution
of the Gujarat government under Article 86(2), read with
Article 356(1), of the Constitution of India for the failure
of the state’s constitutional machinery, in case there
is no immediate action ordered against the accused this
sting has exposed.
Muslim leaders and all those who sympathise with the victims
should move the SC with prayers that:
• In view of the large-scale complicity of the Gujarat
police and administration in these crimes, as revealed in
the TEHELKA exposé, the entire matter should be
handed over to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
The CBI should also be directed to seek necessary sanctions
from the appropriate authorities under Section 197 of the
CRPC for initiating criminal proceedings against accused
public servants.
• The SC should order the arrest of Gujarat Chief
Minister Narendra Modi, former Minister of State for Home
Gordhan Zadaphia, MLA Haresh Bhatt, former Police Commissioner
PC Pandey, vHP and Bajrang Dal activists Rajendra Vyas and
Babu Bajrangi, government counsel Arvind Pandya etc. After
all, this is how murderers and their accomplices all over
India are treated under criminal law for cognisable, non-bailable
offences.
• After filing this petition if the SC does not take
prompt action against these persons, proceedings of criminal
contempt should be initiated against the presiding judge/judges
under Section 16 of the Contempt of Court Act, in their
court itself for their self-trial.
When the perpetrators of such heinous crimes are allowed
to remain free by law, it greatly demoralises the public.
This is what ensures the electoral victory of such persons
as Narendra Modi who not only handsomely won the post-riot
polls in 2002, but also campaigned for the BJP in Rajasthan,
Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, where the party won precisely
on the plank of such aggressive Hindutva. If the people
TEHELKA has exposed are not punished, then all those who
are shedding crocodile tears over this investigation can
expect to see Narendra Modi in power again with a resounding
victory in the coming Gujarat elections, for the simple
reason that this time the voters will hold Modi in still
greater awe.
Any one of these — the President of India, the Governor
of Gujarat, the Chief Justice of Gujarat, the Government
of India and the Parliament (by calling a special session)
could have initiated action in this case. But, alas, that
was not to be! Or is this precisely the way Hindu-majority
“secular” India subdues Muslims, by turning
a blind eye to their State-sponsored massacre?
With the benefit of hindsight, it now appears that India
in 1947 should not have promised Muslims that they would
be protected and treated at par with Hindus.
Rather, it should have asked Muslims to go to Pakistan after
Partition, if this is the conduct secular India’s
various constitutional authorities intended to adopt.
Hem Raj Jain, New Delhi
|
|
|
|
Tehelka
Magazine, Vol 4, Issue 44, Dated Nov 17, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|