Archives
CHANNELS
 Current Affairs
 Engaged Circle
 De-Classified
 Edit -Opinion
 Society & Lifestyle
 Features
 Bouquets & Bricks
 Business & Economy
 Archives
People Power
Wanted: Your story

INVESTIGATION  
Cover Story

COMMITTEE REPORT

‘If Rathore had filed FIR on time and arrested Pandher, seven lives would have been saved’

Even the Uttar Pradesh government’s own report finds Noida police officialdom guilty of gross negligence and dereliction of duty, report Mihir Srivastava and Sanjay Dubey

Black-coat fury: Pandher after he was attacked by lawyers and the public at the Ghaziabad court
AP Photo
 
It damns the police saying even in the cases of minors, FIRs were not lodged when cases of kidnapping should have been registered immediately
A high-level two-member inquiry committee constituted by the UP government to look into how the police handled the complaints from parents of missing children, found two Senior Superintendents of Police, Noida, RKS Rathore and Piyush Mordia guilty of gross dereliction of duty.

The committee’s conclusions were contained in its final report, which was submitted to the government on January 5 by the two members — AC Sharma, adg (Crime and Law and Order) and AK Sinha, UP Home Secretary. They had submitted an interim report on January 3.

Compared to Mordia, the final report is more severe in its indictment of Rathore. However, while Mordia was suspended immediately after the interim report was submitted, Rathore has not been suspended yet.

The report states: “SSP RKS Rathore was unable to get Payal’s FIR registered in time. The FIR was lodged on October 6 and contained the names of both the men arrested by the police. It is only after this that the facts of the case came out in the open… Had Rathore ordered the registration of the FIR and arrested the duo, seven lives would have been saved. Rathore’s gross folly reflects his negligence and ineptitude. He is recommended for a major punishment.”

Citing the police’s criminal indifference, the report says, “FIRs were not lodged even in cases which involved minors. Such cases of kidnapping must be immediately registered, as minors could not have given any legal consent. Similarly, in the cases involving adults, FIRs were not registered even after many days.”

The reasons why the committee recommended punishment for Mordia and Rathore in its interim and final reports are their inability to get the cases registered and their failure to give necessary instructions to their juniors. In light of this, the following observations in the report are pertinent:

The reports state that after the recovery of human skeletons from D-5, Sector 31, in Noida it became clear that the police had no information whatsoever about five victims whose skeletal remains was found. The final report says, “There is a strong possibility that the reports (about the missing victims) were not lodged even after their kin had informed the police that they were missing… This is a grave error and indicates how this ps functioned.”

All senior officers knew about the missing children because their parents were in touch with them and Nithari was only two km away
Four of these five abductions occurred during Rathore’s tenure as SSP, Noida. Only one case of not filing an FIR happened during Mordia’s tenure. The report also states: “The yearly and half-yearly inspection of the Sector 20 ps was done by RK Vishwakarma, DIG Meerut range; RKS Rathore, SSP, Gautam Budh Nagar; Saumitra Yadav, SP City; and Sewak Ram Yadav, CO. The SSP, SP City and circle officer also conducted surprise inspections. They should have given the necessary instructions during their inspections so that proper efforts could have been taken.”

The report’s indictment of the police is forthright, “The police’s first shortcoming was that instead of registering FIRs, only entries in the (GD) General Diary were made. Second, the available details about the missing children were not analysed properly and the investigation was limited to prostitution and begging gangs. Third, in the case of Payal, five months were lost before an FIR was lodged. Fourth, Moninder Pandher was summoned to the ps earlier but he was not interrogated properly. Fifth, the ps had no information at all about the five victims who were missing. Sixth, by and large, the police officials did not show any empathy with the victims.”

Rathore and Dinesh Yadav, Circle Officer, Noida — both still in service — stand guilty on all the six counts, whereas some of the suspended police officers including Mordia are not guilty on all the counts. However, Rathore is still in-charge of Noida police and the report gives Yadav only rap in the knuckles after holding him responsible for serious lapses. The report recommends minor punishment for him, saying that after the registration of an FIR in Payal’s case, he worked with complete dedication. Tehelka has evidence which shows Dinesh Yadav’s complicity in covering up the crime and how he was virtually forced by the High Court to finally solve the case.

Instead of the 12 cases of missing victims during Rathore’s tenure as SSP, Noida, the report provides information on only 8 cases, whereas it correctly provides information on all the 19 victims who went missing during Mordia’s tenure. This indicates two possible scenarios — either at the time of the committee’s inquiry on January 2-3, the police did not know exactly how many went missing during Rathore’s tenure or wrong information was provided to the committee, possibly to save Rathore and Dinesh Yadav.

There is no mention of Rathore or Yadav in the interim report, but it recommended action against three senior police officers — Mordia, Saumitra Yadav and SR Yadav, and six junior officers — Vinod Pandey, Rajiv Baliyan, KP Singh, Simranjit Kaur who were in-charge of the police post — and sos RN Yadav and Deepak Chaturvedi.

In the final report, the committee also recommends milder action against some junior police officials. The report also observes that there were several chowki in-charges in Nithari, such as Chhote Singh, Yaad Ram Singh and Sati Chauhan who were transferred within a month of taking charge, even though not a single case of a missing person was reported during their tenure. However Simranjit Singh, despite having been suspended several times earlier, stayed on in the chowki for almost four months even after the skeletons were found. Tehelka has proof that Sati Chauhan provided false evidence to the court in Payal’s case, but this was not known to the committee and hence does not find mention in the report.

It appears that in the process of saving two senior police officers, Rathore and Yadav, four junior officers — RN Parashar, Anuj Kumar, Kamal Singh Yadav and VP Singh — also escaped punishment.

Severely indicting the entire Noida police force, the committee observes, “The Sector 20 ps, and offices of the co, sp and SSP are within two kilometers of Nithari. The relatives of the missing people were in constant touch with all the officials. This means that right from the in-charge of the police post to the senior officials, all were in the know of this matter.”

The committee’s report enumerates lapses before the Nithari case became a national sensation, but the police’s inability to find at least 20 more skeletons and missing torsos of the children from the drain behind house D-5, Sector 31 requires another high-level inquiry.

Feb 10 , 2007
Related Stories


Full Interview
EXPOSED : THE UNACCEPTABLE SHAME OF NITHARI
CALLOUS DERELICT COMPLICIT
THE CONSPIRACY ON PHONE RECORDS
‘If Rathore had filed FIR on time and arrested Pandher, seven lives would have been saved’

Print this story Feedback Add to favorites Email this story

  About Us | Advertise With Us | Print Subscriptions | Syndication | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Contact Us | Bouquets & Brickbats