|
|
|
| CURRENT
AFFAIRS |
|
Pros
& cons |
|
|
|
INDO-PAK
TALKS It
will take more than a new mechanism to build trust and ties
 |
 |
Thaw and freeze
work so seamlessly between the subcontinent’s big two that it’s
tough not to be a shade cynical about news of a fresh breakthrough in
Havana. Such bonhomie and making of common cause at the top leadership
level isn’t unprecedented. What’s happened more often, unfortunately,
is the rapid dissipation of concord once leaders have departed from
summits, and the resumption of discord. What’s different this
time, we are being told on high authority, is that India and Pakistan
have actually agreed to institute a joint mechanism to counter terror,
their resolve is to be on the same team against the menace. Surely a
huge achievement, at least on paper. Consider the commonsense implication
of this: India’s biggest bugbear could now become its ally, indeed
New Delhi could consider most of its terrorism-related problems sorted
for isn’t it India’s case that Pakistan is the fount of
the trouble on its soil? If that sounds too good to be true, it’s
probably the right ring to things. Consider the proposition playing
out. Will Pakistan now cough up Dawood Ibrahim, red-flagged internationally
as a terrorist? Will it manacle the likes of Maulana Masood Azhar and
Syed Salahuddin for their overt and covert support to violent intervention
on Indian soil? Will it take a fresh look at that list of wanted men
the NDA government had handed over to General Pervez Musharraf and which
Pakistan has never really responded to with any credibility? Unlikely.
The reasons are
only too many. They range from unresolved attrition over Kashmir, which
has driven Pakistan to several military and guerrilla misadventures,
to the Islamabad establishment’s proven inability to control elements
that work within and outside the State. The Kargil intrusion happened
mostly unknown to Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. The ISI’s collusion
with Talibani and terrorist outfits continues, mocking General Musharraf’s
vision of creating a modern State fashioned on the lines of Kemal Ataturk’s
Turkey. Pakistan isn’t an easy plate to possess. It was probably
a clever come-hither ploy to set Musharraf as a terror victim as a preface
to setting up the joint counter-mechanism; the Pakistani leader has
escaped three assassination bids and remains a target of forces ranged
against the US-led war on terror. But then can India expect help from
Musharraf even if he genuinely wants to extend it?
It serves nobody’s
cause to knock the Havana initiative, as the bjp has done, because conversation
is key to any breakthrough. At the same time, though, it isn’t
unreasonable to remain sceptical about the prospects of thaw, trust
and transparency becoming the essential descriptors of relations between
India and Pakistan. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has probably put things
in the correct perspective by stating that the new mechanism will be
made or unmade by how Pakistan exhibits its determination to contain
and fight off terror, at home and on Indian soil.
|
Sep
30 , 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|